• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    Broke: Car C is being a responsible, safety focused driver

    Woke: Car C is holding up traffic for no good reason

    Bespoke: Car Pink is whipping around that turn at 80 kmph and going to kill everyone anyone, so don’t sweet it.

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Wait until you see the magic roundabout in the UK. It’s a “close your eyes, pray and hit the gas” type of place.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I knew a girl who was instructed to turn left at a roundabout, so she proceeded to turn left when merging into the roundabout.

    Poor girl, fortunately everything was fine (she did fail, but no accidents) but that’s a special kind of ‘too literal’ that loops back around to being dumb.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And that’s why turn-by-turn navigation systems phrase it as “take the third exit from the roundabout” these days.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The lion does not concern himself with car C. Car D should plough straight through them.

  • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The hard part is when back to back traffic for 15 miles worth of cars is coming from one direction and everyone else is either too scared to zipper merge or they allow the one direction to have perpetual right of way.

    At some point of heavy traffic, the circle right of way must yield for zipper merging, else face my ass aggro merging and beeping at everyone who doesn’t.

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Replace the pink car with a bicycle an A is suddenly not being in the mood to yield anymore.

    I was going straight once and had to go back in and do a full turn (180° + 360°) because of that.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I’m a daily cyclist and I think I’d be terrified to bike through a full roundabout. They’re absolutely marvelous designs for throughput that doesn’t require complex signal automation, but the flip side of that is they’re pretty hostile if you’re not a motor vehicle. Any truly good roundabout design should include pedestrian and cycle paths along the periphery that have priority when crossing the circles entrances.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      All cars will yield to a bicycle in the UK, because less protected members of the road traffic always take priority.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        All cars should yield.

        When I used to cycle, I’d just go on the pavements at large roundabouts. Not much point in being right but dead.

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I personally never had any issues. British drivers are very polite and cautious.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Welp, I’m not in the UK.
        Over here, people go with - what is the most threatening to themselves - and it really feels weird that people who have presumably passed the driving exam are worse at roundabouts than me.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Turnabout fucking sucks.

    Way more go wrong than lights, increase car to car interactions massively, inappropriate european fad. This for place that don’t mind getting bog down doing more than an hour to get 50km away because they don’t have important things to do

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    As the circle enlarges, the system approaches four T-intersections. What I want to know is: at what size circle to people lose their minds and become unable to comprehend how T-intersections work.

    Fair play to people confused about multi-lane roundabouts though.

  • Gurei@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When I have a Car D behind me, it’s because they overestimate my car’s acceleration capabilities.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Right, that’s the funny thing about roundabouts. They’re a marvelous solution to local motor vehicle throughput. That become completely unnecessary if your traffic is anything besides motor vehicles. In fact, for bikes and pedestrians and anyone else who can look at each other eye to eye and even just talk to one another if need be, no signals or signs are necessary at all.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well yes, but actually bikes wouldn’t even need a roundabout with rules like this in the first place.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m waiting til it becomes normal for individuals to use old school buses as their commuter vehicles. It’s the inevitable destination of the car size war.

  • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m always the pink car but get cut off by car A who decides to gun it soon as I’m right where pink car is