The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

  • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    Having read the title and also the whole article… Let me say. The fuck no you can’t. Let’s get letigious or let’s get the vests. I’ve got over 200 years of jurisprecisence and the moral high road. We can skip the cultural perogative if you really want to. Or in this case you can endorse it. It doesn’t matter to me. as a cisgender white male and, and prolific gun owner, who is utterly tired of this already, let’s fuckin go. I’ve been waiting and i’ve finally got the perfect set up to tell you how many ways you can blow it out your ass.

    Disgusting anti American anti constitutional blowhards all of them.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      When did they mention migrants at all? The way this is written up is that anyone can be acted upon, all it requires is a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang. And lets face it, if they have their way no one will be checking anyone’s documents before, during or after these raids.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      actually anyone can be “considered illegal” they left enough vagueness in the policy.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    The only time the Alien Enemies act should be used is in an extreme emergency: Say, for example, an orange man wanting to press a big red button to burn the world to cinders.

    ICE, if it truly wanted to do things the right way, can do the ‘practicable’, by waiting for judges and their juries to render judgement. As we have clearly seen, ICE doesn’t measure up to even basic sense nor decency. Here’s hoping that ICE is broken by the people, for the people.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “Hiel Trump” is required when people meet in public or private. Any hesitation must be treated with aggressive concern and reported to all, immediately. This is the only way to keep America safe from (insert current list of threats).

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Any law, rule or regulation that violates the constitution is invalid. The Supreme Court has ruled on this in multiple cases. Unless Congress passes a constitutional amendment that eliminates the 4th amendment, the executive branch must abide by the law as it’s written. The executive branch has no authority to make, change or interpret law.

    Edit: A lot of laws and constitutional amendments have been made since the 1798 Alien Enemies Act was passed. The 13th Amendment banned slavery (with a loophole) The 14th Amendment gave equal protection under the law among other things. The 1964 Civil Rights Act made it a crime to discriminate based on race and national origin, which pretty much destroys the Alien Enemies Act. No altering the enforcement of our laws based on where the person came from or what they look like.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Correct. At this point a few ICE agents need to be treated as armed intruders and dealt with.

      We don’t do this in an armed society … it’s why we are armed.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s totally fine everyone. Obviously this would only ever happen to poor people or bad people or other people /s.

    Seriously though, where the fuck are all the people screaming about freedom?

  • P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Something something illegal search and seizure blah blah blah, meaningless paper to the people who claim it to be the one all, be all document.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Can’t wait to hear people like Alex Jones defend this. Can’t wait for every sovcit to defend this. Can’t wait for every Gadsden flag flag and bumper sticker to defend this.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Remember when democrats got all heated about G Gordon Liddy saying “if the feds come to your door, shoot them in the head” (to account for body armor)?

    I don’t know why that popped into my head just now.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 hours ago

    uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections

    …That’s not how the relationship between laws and the Constitution works.

    Journalists don’t need to just print both sides arguments and throw their hands up like determining truth is beyond them. Don’t print lies and falsehoods without immediately pointing out they’re lies and falsehoods. They didn’t find a glitch in the system that maybe the courts will patch eventually, they’re making up unlawful justifications to violate constitutional rights. Yeah, constitutional rights aren’t going to save you from the violation, but we all need to know and establish that it’s a violation in advance. ICE could always enter your home without a warrant, they just couldn’t do it legally, and a memo from fascist Barbie hasn’t changed that.

    • Dzso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      Your mistake is thinking that the media in the US employ journalists. They’re oligarch controlled propaganda machines.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Why?

        Are you unarmed and regretting your anti gun political beliefs as you run head first into this brick wall of reality?